rosiedoes: (CS: Meh)
Rosie ([personal profile] rosiedoes) wrote2008-09-25 12:01 pm
Entry tags:

(no subject)

Does anyone else miss bands releasing real singles?

You remember the kind: you'd get all excited waiting for the release day, then you'd head down to the local record shop on your lunchbreak or after school/work, then you'd get home and actually put it in a CD player to listen.

And there would be B-sides! Actual B-sides! Other songs, not related to the album - not just remixes or cover versions - real, additional tracks from your favourite band. Bonus music for being dedicated enough to go and buy the singles.

Now, you get shitty, lower-quality versions on iTunes, no B-sides and you can't use it on more than a couple of formats. Yeah, they might be cheaper, but they're not tangible. When I buy something, I want to be able to hold it in my hand, y'know?

And what especially pisses me off is now Fall Out Boy are releasing their new album on iTunes track by track. Sure, there will be a CD on November 4th, but for those of us who prefer to do the ritual - the going to the shop, the peeling off the plastic and the reading the inlay booklet during that first listen; hearing the whole album in order, as it was planned to be heard - are fucked. Sure, we can wait for the new album to come out in the shops, but this is the internet age. This is the blog age, where people will be posting reviews within minutes of the tracks being made available. For anyone who doesn't want to be spoiled and want to discover the tracks in context by ourselves, it means avoiding the internet, or the comms where it would be likely to be discussed.

Yes, leaks happen; but with leaks, there is generally a divide between those who will wait for the official version, and those who will go ahead and download the music. If the music is made legally available ahead of time, presumably in an attempt to curb the leaks and promote interest, many more people will have access to it and will be discussing it openly, assuming everyone has heard it.

This may even be detrimental to the album sales (the single didn't even make the top twenty in Billboard's Hot 100, and in the Canadian chart has already dropped to #89 in its second week), because as soon as it is made available on iTunes, it can be decoded and leaked to the general public - which may result in lower album sales. Infinity on High was leaked a few days before it was due for release, but a strong moral section of the fanbase refused to download illegally and casual fans were unlikely to know with any great certainty where to access the leak. If more people have early access to the songs, they can be reposted more widely.

In a nutshell, I think this iTunes thing is a stupid idea and the more I see Pete promoting it, the more I want to shake him. People aren't buying the single because they already have it and there is no incentive to spend money on something they can get for free behind closed doors. To the best of my knowledge, the single doesn't have a CD release date (if it does, please tell me so I can go and buy it), and if that is a case there is nothing for fans who will have accessed the track already (almost all illegally, I'm fairly certain) to gain from spending money through Apple (who I dislike intensely anyway).

In fact, I resent being forced to give money to a company I dislike, just so I can hear music from my favourite band. I don't own an iPod, or an iPhone, I didn't even have iTunes installed until I wrote a review on it for HRE - I hadn't actually opened the programme since.

Why should I be dictated to about where to spend my money?

The more I think about this, the angrier I get.

[identity profile] rosiedoes.livejournal.com 2008-09-25 02:32 pm (UTC)(link)
It got to 21 on the Hot 100, and it's out of the top 50 already - God knows how far out of the top 50, but it explains why every single post anywhere is begging people to buy it on iTunes.

[identity profile] edgiko.livejournal.com 2008-09-25 05:04 pm (UTC)(link)
D: Oh god, I'm not liking where this is going for the album. Hopefully the video will boast it a little but they really need to change their game plan.

[identity profile] rosiedoes.livejournal.com 2008-09-25 05:27 pm (UTC)(link)
They do. They need to put out some real singles and NOT RELEASE EVERY TRACK ONE AT A TIME.

[identity profile] edgiko.livejournal.com 2008-09-25 06:34 pm (UTC)(link)
Seriously. :/ God..they can make really shitty business discussions sometimes. I hope it doesn't fully bite them in the ass.

[identity profile] edgiko.livejournal.com 2008-09-25 06:41 pm (UTC)(link)
Makes me wonder who they do go to for business discussions. Wentz may not be my most favorite of the band members, but he does have a great understanding of business.

Maybe the person was all "hey, this is a great idea to prevent leaking" not looking at the cons of this discussion outweigh the pros. Again, they need album sales to have it successful. You can't rely on the sells of the singles and releasing THE ENTIRE ALBUM SINGLE BY SINGLE is a terrible fucking idea. People are going to buy the album already so they're not going to go out and buy the actual thing; whether it's digital or hard.

[identity profile] rosiedoes.livejournal.com 2008-09-25 06:44 pm (UTC)(link)
I think it's actually kind of a ploy to get more money out of people. They think kids will buy the tracks to hear them as they come out, because everyone else has them, and then go and buy the CD as well.

I think they think we're stupid.

[identity profile] edgiko.livejournal.com 2008-09-25 07:01 pm (UTC)(link)
Now some people might do that just because they are supporting the band and they have money to spare..but others are that stupid.

Its probably a mixture of both. Its such a gamble though. Why risk it especially when your single isn't doing that well.

[identity profile] rosiedoes.livejournal.com 2008-09-25 07:02 pm (UTC)(link)
I really have no idea.