[livejournal.com profile] sherlockbbc Fanworks FAQ draft post

Thursday, 2 September 2010 08:58 pm
rosiedoes: (Sherlock: John!Bullshit)
[personal profile] rosiedoes
Welcome to the [livejournal.com profile] sherlockbbc Fanworks FAQ!

This post should clarify the most common questions relating to fanworks, including terminology and how best to go about sharing your work.

As always, let us know in comments if you feel anything needs to be added.



Fan Fiction

Q1. What types of fan fiction be posted on [livejournal.com profile] sherlockbbc?

A. Any fic which is directly centred on Sherlock is acceptable - whether the over all theme is gen, slash, het or even a crossover with another fandom, provided the Sherlock aspect is central to the story. For stories featuring issues which may trigger personal emotional sensitivity - such as self-harm, drug use, eating disorders, abuse or rape - writers are required to post a warning. Authors failing to do so will be asked to add clear warnings to story headers within the community post. Those who refuse will have their stories removed and in extreme casesmay not be allowed to post in future.

RPF or RPS fic and stories based on other projects by the Sherlock cast is not permitted.

Q2. What do terms like 'slash', 'RPS/RPF' and 'non-con' mean?

A. Slash is a sub-type of fan fiction which focuses primarily on homosexual relationships between characters, which are not necessarily part of the source material.

Canon is a term used to refer to the source material or original works; in the Sherlock fandom, the 'canon' is the TV Series, with some information drawn from the original books. Matters which are not canon, but are generally accepted by fans - for example, a character such as Lestrade may be commonly given the same first name, even if none is confirmed during the show - are often called 'fanon'.

RPF/RPS is shorthand for 'Real Person Fiction' or 'Real Person Slash' which are stories in which the actors, rather than the characters, are the subject matter.

Non-con and the lesser-used dub-con stand for 'non-consentual' and 'dubious consent' respectively. These stories will feature scenes of rape or rough/aggressive sex, for which the consent of all parties involved may not be clear. However, 'dub-con' may also mean stories featuring situations in which one character is intoxicated, for example, and not in a position to give informed consent although the actions themselves are not violent. Readers are advised to take story ratings into account in relation to these fics.

Q3. How will I know how explicit a story is before I read it?

A. Writers posting at [livejournal.com profile] sherlockbbc are required to list certain aspects of their stories in headers - this includes a rating, which will help identify the suitability of the story for various audiences.

While writers often use different scales to identify the rating of their story, the more common ratings fall into the following scales:

All Ages G U
Some bad language/light violence PG *
Mild sexuality/violence/stronger language PG-13 T/Teen
Stronger sexual themes/violence R M/Mature
Graphic descriptions of sex and/or violence NC-17 A/Adult


Q4. What information should I put in my fanfic header?

A. Many things can be included in headers, but you may choose to include the following:
- the title of your story;
- the names of any betas or brit-pickers (if they wish to be credited);
- the rating;
- pairing(s) featured in the story;
- an approximate wordcount;
- warnings about content which people may prefer not to read for personal reasons;
- a disclaimer, to make it clear you are not profiting from the work you are sharing.

Items show in italics are mandatory.

Q5. What are betas and brit-pickers and do I need one?

A. Betas are effectively proofreaders who will read through your fics and point out any mistakes, areas which may be slightly out of character or other discrepancies. They are basically a second pair of eyes to cover anything you may have missed.

Brit-Pickers are similar to beta readers, except their focus is to ensure that writers avoid the cultural and social discrepancies common when writing characters from or living outside of our own countries or regions. In this case, of course, they would look to ensure the accurate portrayal of British language and culture, hence the name.

While betas and brit-pickers are strongly recommended for all writers in all fandoms, as none of us are infallible, they are not a mandatory requirement to post to [livejournal.com profile] sherlockbbc.

Q6. Is podfic (recordings of fanfics being read aloud) accepted on [livejournal.com profile] sherlockbbc?

A. Yes, and it's very popular when it is posted. However, the same rules apply as with a text based story - include a header along with ratings and warnings, and if you are recording someone else's work, ensure you have their permission and link back to the source material.





Fan Art, Icons & Everything Else

Q1. Can fan art be posted on [livejournal.com profile] sherlockbbc?

A. Absolutely, although where explicit images or the situations described above as having the potential to be triggering are concerned, warnings and ratings must be included in a header for the piece.

To preserve the layouts of other users' friends lists, images larger than 400px wide should be placed behind a cut or linked back to your own journal or posting space for the full size version.

In accordance with LiveJournal's terms of service, no images depicting sexual activity with a minor may be posted on [livejournal.com profile] sherlockbbc.

Q2. May I post icons for others to use?

A. Yes - thank you for sharing! However, when posting, please try to condense groups of icons so that if you create more on a running theme you update the original post, rather than making two posts on the same series of icons.

Preview icons are welcome, but please avoid posting more than a handful outside a cut.

Q3. What about fanvids (clips from the series edited and set to music)?

A. Absolutely fine. Disclaimers and headers are advisable, however.

Q4. I have made something relating to the series, which is not official merchandise - may I advertise it on [livejournal.com profile] sherlockbbc?

A. In the past we have approved posts advertising one-off items hand crafted by our users, and would be happy to do so again. However, users creating cottage industries from manufacturing unofficial merch may be at risk of prosecution by the BBC and the show's creators. The community mods take no responsibility for the consequences of advertising and/or selling homemade Sherlock products.

on 2010-09-02 08:20 pm (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] vinylsigns.livejournal.com
Maybe want to clarify dubcon--typically it is rather violent, but if it's a situation like John is drugged/drunk/in some sort of altered state of mind, but Sherlock goes along with it, not really sure what he's doing or why he's doing it, that could be considered dubcon too, without the aggressive part.

But otherwise I think it looks fantastic :D

on 2010-09-02 08:57 pm (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] vinylsigns.livejournal.com
Draft of the actor stuff/downloads and requests (http://vinylsigns.livejournal.com/227174.html), but I feel like a bit more needs to be on the latter.
Edited on 2010-09-02 08:58 pm (UTC)

on 2010-09-02 09:45 pm (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] rosiedoes.livejournal.com
How do you feel about the updates so far? I need to go to bed shortly - what other points should we cover?

I'm about to go back and add podfic to the fanfic section and I'm guessing we need to include vids and fanmixes at least.

on 2010-09-02 09:59 pm (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] vinylsigns.livejournal.com
Looks great! (sorry for the delay, notification fail) I'd say something about picspams, but I have no idea how we'd ever get a rein on that that doesn't make mods look really bad.

on 2010-09-02 10:11 pm (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] vinylsigns.livejournal.com
I still think that territory is a little too sticky. There haven't been very many lately either. Maybe we'll cross that bridge if people ask about it after posting the fanworks FAQ, or at least see what [livejournal.com profile] awesome has to say.

on 2010-09-02 10:16 pm (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] rosiedoes.livejournal.com
Cool. I don't mind. We could argue the point that picspams don't bring anything new creatively to the comm.

Fics do, art does, vids do - people are taking the source material and altering it to make it something new, whereas picspams are broadly posted for comments with no real change to the images.

on 2010-09-02 10:20 pm (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] vinylsigns.livejournal.com
I got chewed out at the implication that prompters were bored or uninspired; how much pushback do you reckon there'll be if we flat out say picspams bring nothing to the table, even if it is a logical statement?

on 2010-09-02 10:24 pm (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] rosiedoes.livejournal.com
To be frank: I don't care. If they don't like it, they can leave - it's not as if we're struggling for members, here. Rules are being suggested and implemented for the good of the majority, not of the few geniuses who keep reposting the same pics. Giving them a weekly space to share would a) clear things up most of the week and b) self-archive the posts.

That poster was an arrogant, self-absorbed moron. It was all about her, not about what you said - she was just put out that her post had been deleted. It wouldn't have mattered what you said or how you said it, she still would have bitched about it. She was talking out of her arse as it was. Don't let people like her threaten you, dude. You're the one putting in the hours to make this a sane place for other people to enjoy, she isn't.

on 2010-09-02 10:33 pm (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] vinylsigns.livejournal.com
Yeah, it's not very often that picspams do anything special, I just didn't want anyone to feel persecuted, if it came down to that. For practicality, let's go ahead and put it in the FAQ, do a weekly pimp post.

I think I was less threatened and more worried about how it'd be perceived; you mentioned a few posts back that fandom can be incredibly selfish and vain, and if drama was going to start over what amounted to taking away posting opportunities I wanted to avoid that. But in this case it's more important to carry on being honest and direct, as we have been.

So yeah, picspams put on hold.

on 2010-09-02 10:34 pm (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] rosiedoes.livejournal.com
Ultimately, we're not saying, "No picspams!" - we're just saying, "Spamturday!"

I think they might get lolcat.

on 2010-09-02 10:38 pm (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] vinylsigns.livejournal.com
Possibly with a pic of Watson doing slowwww fingerpoint typing from TGG.

on 2010-09-02 10:39 pm (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] rosiedoes.livejournal.com
What about including macros and gifs there as well, in that case?

on 2010-09-02 10:41 pm (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] vinylsigns.livejournal.com
people tend to use the "random fun" tag for macro stories, but I don't see why not

on 2010-09-02 10:42 pm (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] rosiedoes.livejournal.com
I created a macro tag the other day, under fanworks...

I'm just thinking it would be a good place to put loads of silly image-based randomness.

on 2010-09-02 10:44 pm (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] vinylsigns.livejournal.com
In a way, though, macros and gifs are still contributing and creating something new, far more than picspams. Unless it's just Mean Girls reference #23434656645

on 2010-09-02 10:45 pm (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] rosiedoes.livejournal.com
I have never seen Mean Girls, but I rarely look at macros anyway... You're right though, they do. Maybe that's one to throw to vote?

on 2010-09-02 10:47 pm (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] vinylsigns.livejournal.com
Fine with me.

Also, didn't you need to go to bed, like, an hour ago? :P

on 2010-09-02 10:48 pm (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] rosiedoes.livejournal.com
Oh, I know. I will in a minute.

on 2010-09-02 10:52 pm (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] vinylsigns.livejournal.com
Night! <3

on 2010-09-02 08:26 pm (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] purplefog.livejournal.com
Looks good - is it mentioned anywhere that RPF is not supported, or did that get changed?

on 2010-09-02 08:29 pm (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] rosiedoes.livejournal.com
Yup. It's covered in the first part, and also in the Comm FAQ, which will be a separate post.

on 2010-09-03 05:45 am (UTC)
Posted by [identity profile] purplefog.livejournal.com
Aha... I missed that one *blush*

Most Popular Tags

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Thursday, 29 May 2025 12:11 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios